white-collar daily wear
PYROTECHNIC POSTERS ARE FIREWORKS DRAWN ON PAPER
PYROTECHNIC POSTERS ARE FIREWORKS DRAWN ON PAPER

PYROTECHNIC POSTERS ARE FIREWORKS DRAWN ON PAPER

There’s a deep like lots of humans feel for fire; it’s commonly mentioned as one of the most crucial discoveries that led to the founding of civilization. The work of French creative duo [Pinaffo-Pluvinage] absolutely hits upon that, integrating pyrotechnics with paper to make what are most likely the most interesting posters you’ve ever seen, as reported by Heise Online.

The artworks are made with a range of powders, including those for blue as well as red flames as well as one with a special “scintillating” effect.
The posters aren’t huge, measuring 50 cm x 70 cm. However, what they lack in size, they comprise for with literal flames. Yes, the posters are laced with a range of pyrotechnic powders that combust in a range of styles as well as patterns to produce a dynamic burning artwork when ignited.

Each poster is therefore a work of art in both the visual as well as combustible realms. different parts of the artwork shed at differnt rates as well as with different colored flames, contributing to the performance when the poster is burned. Impressively, the artworks are not destroyed in the process; the pyrotechnic material burns off with much flame as well as smoke without destroying the poster itself.

Putting together the posters wasn’t as basic as just doodling some designs. The duo had to establish their own techniques to apply the pyrotechnic material to the paper. Reportedly, the effort took numerous experiments to get right.

It’s uncertain precisely exactly how the impact is accomplished without burning the whole poster down; one suspects some type of protective layer may be used. It’s rather the opposite of flash paper, which consumes the paper itself in the combustion.

In any type of case, fireworks professionals will likely have some great concepts of the chemicals utilized to accomplish the flaming effects; noise off in the comments if you understand what’s what!

The pieces might be interpreted as a commentary on the transience of all things, or the artist’s intent might have been something different entirely. who can say? video after the break.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *